Effectiveness of Self-Information Leaflet on Knowledge regarding Immunization among Nursing Students.“If Everything is God’s will, then so is the Invention of the Vaccine, just like the seatbelt”
Ms Anju Arora
BIMR Nursing College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India Pin 474020
*Corresponding Author Email: aroraanju3@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Vaccination is one of the most important elements of global health. It helps to prevent morbidity and mortality in more than two million children under five years of age. Study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of self- information leaflet on knowledge of immunization among 2nd year nursing students. Design and method: A one-group pre test- posttest design was used. A sample of 30 students was selected by purposive sampling technique. Descriptive statistics like percentage, mean, standard deviation, and inferential statistics like paired t test, ANOVA was used to determine the effectiveness of leaflet and association with demographic variables. The results depicted that in pretest 12(40%) had poor knowledge, 16(53.3%) had average knowledge, 2(6.7%) had good knowledge. In post test 10(33.3%) had good knowledge regarding immunization. The mean difference was found to be 4.66 the calculated t value was found to be statistically significant at 0.05 levels reveling the effectiveness of information booklet on immunization, no significant association was found between posttest knowledge score with the demographic variables.
KEYWORDS: Self-Information Leaflet, Knowledge, Immunization
INTRODUCTION:
Immunity enables the body to defend itself against disease caused by certain microorganism. Immunity may occur on its own (when people are exposed to bacteria and viruses) or by vaccination. Vaccination is one of the well-known and effective methods of preventing childhood diseases1. With the implementation of the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) by the government of India, significant achievements have been made in preventing and controlling vaccine preventable disease (VPDs).
Every year an immunization week is being celebrated in last week of April with main aim to promote use of vaccines, to protect people of all ages against diseases. Immunization saves millions of lives and is widely recognized as one of the world’s most successful and cost effective health intervention. Immunization helps to prevent all children of the world against seven vaccine preventable disease namely - Diphtheria, Whooping cough, tetanus, polio, tuberculosis, measles, and hepatitis B. Interruption of the schedule with delay between vaccine doses does not interfere with the final immunity achieved2. One effective way of controlling the spread of infection is to strengthen the host defenses. Under certain circumstances active immunization, which is one of the most powerful and cost effective weapons of modern medicine may accomplish this. There are some infectious disease whose control is based on active immunization e.g. polio, tetanus, diphtheria and measles. Vaccine is an immuno- biological substance designed to produce specific protection against a given disease. It stimulates the production of protective antibody and other immune mechanism5. Vaccines may be prepared from live modified organisms, inactivated or killed organisms, extracted cellular fractions, toxoids or combination of these. Most recent preparations are subunit vaccines and recombinant vaccines.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:
A Study to assess the effectiveness of self- information leaflet on knowledge regarding immunization among IIndyear B.Sc. Nursing students of BIMR Nursing College Gwalior.
OBJECTIVES:
· To assess the existing level of knowledge regarding immunization among IIndyear B.Sc. Nursing students.
· To evaluate the effectiveness of self- information leaflet on knowledge regarding immunization among IIndyear B.Sc. Nursing students.
· To determine the association between post-test knowledge score with certain demographic variables like age, sex, previous knowledge on immunization and source of information.
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS:
H1- there is significant difference between pre and post test knowledge score of the students regarding immunization.
H2- there is significant association between post-test score and selected demographic variables.
Conceptual framework-
Based on Imogene king goal attainment theory.
METHODOLOGY:
Research methodology is the means by which we collect data to answer research questions or to test hypothesis. Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may be understood as a science of studying how research is done scientifically7. (C.R.Kothari)
Research Approach:
Quantitative evaluative approach was considered the most appropriate to achieve the objectives of study.
Research Design:
Pre- Experimental Design (one group Pre- test and Post- test design)
Setting:
“Setting is the physical location and condition in which data collection takes place in a study”6. The present study was conducted in BIMR Nursing College, Gwalior. The investigator found the setting appropriate to conduct the study for following reasons such as availability of study subjects, the proximity of selected area, permission granted from higher authority.
Population:
The population of this study comprised of nursing students.
Sample-size:
30 B.Sc (Nursing) students
Sampling technique:
Sampling technique refers to the process of selecting a subset of the population in order to obtain information regarding phenomenon in a way that represents the entire population.
Purposive Sampling technique adopted by the investigator is to have adequate subjects to participate in the study with set inclusion criteria. In addition, this technique was suitable to complete the study within the stipulated time.
Sample Inclusion Criteria:
· Able to read and write in English.
· Willing to participate in study
· Present at the time of data collection
Exclusion Criteria:
· Ill during the time of study
· Not willing to participate.
Method of Data-collection:
· Self- Structured questionnaire to assess the knowledge regarding immunization schedule, cold-chain, adverse reaction3,4
Data Collection Procedure:
Pretest was conducted by using self- structured questionnaire to assess the knowledge regarding immunization.
Immediately after Pretest, Self-information leaflet was given to the students to read about immunization-schedule, cold-chain, adverse-reaction.
2nd day, posttest was conducted by using the same self- structured questionnaire to assess the knowledge.
Plan for data analysis:
Descriptive Statistics - Percentage, Mean, and Standard deviation.
Inferential Statistics - Paired t test and ANOVA test.
FINDINGS:
Section A-
Table I- Pre-test level of knowledge of students on immunization. n=30
|
Level of knowledge |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Poor |
12 |
40.0 |
|
Average |
16 |
53.3 |
|
Good |
2 |
6.7 |
Table-II Post-test level of knowledge of students on immunization n=30
|
Level of knowledge |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Poor |
4 |
13.3 |
|
Average |
16 |
53.3 |
|
Good |
10 |
33.3 |
Section B-
Table III- Evaluation of effectiveness of information booklet on immunization by using paired-t test.
|
Type of test |
Mean |
SD |
Mean% |
|
Pretest |
8.57 |
3.287 |
28.56 |
|
Posttest |
13.23 |
4.546 |
44.1 |
CONCLUSION:
Prior to implementation of self-information leaflet students had inadequate knowledge on immunization the effectiveness was evaluated by post-test score- the mean score had improved from 8.57 to 13.23 after implementation of self-information leaflet. It shows that leaflet was effective. The calculated t value is statistically significant at 0.05 levels as the calculated t value is more than the table t value of 2.05
Immunization Schedule
|
Name of vaccine |
Prevent from Disease |
Time |
Dose |
Route |
Site |
|
For Infants |
|||||
|
BCG(Bacillus Calmette Guerin) |
Primary complex, Tuberculosis |
At birth as early as possible till one year of age |
0.1ml |
Intra-dermal |
Left upper arm |
|
OPV-0dose |
Poliomyelitis |
At birth as early as possible within the first 15 days |
2 drops |
Oral |
Oral |
|
OPV-1,2 and 3 dose |
Poliomyelitis |
At 6, 9 months and 4-6 year |
2 drops |
Oral |
Oral |
|
IPV-1,2 and 3 dose |
Poliomyelitis |
At 6,10 and 14 weeks |
05ml |
Intramuscular |
Antero-lateral side of mid thigh |
|
DPT- 1,2 and 3 dose |
Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus |
At 6,10 and 14 weeks |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Antero-lateral side of mid thigh |
|
Hepatitis-B 0, 1,2 and 3 dose |
Hepatitis B virus |
0 dose at birth. Then at 6,10 and 14 weeks |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Antero-lateral side of mid thigh |
|
Hib (Haemophilus influenzae type b) |
Influenza virus (meningitis) |
At 6,10 and 14 Weeks Booster dose at 16-18 months |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Antero-lateral side of mid thigh |
|
PCV(Pneumococal Conjugate Vaccine) |
Pneumonia |
At 6,10 and 14 weeks and Booster dose at 15 months |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Deltoid Muscle |
|
Rotavirus |
Diarrhea and Vomiting |
At 6, 10 and 14 weeks |
Rotarix- 1ml Rotateq- 2ml |
Oral |
Oral |
|
MMR |
Measles, Mumps and Rubella |
9 completed months. Booster dose at 16-24 months |
0.5ml |
Subcutaneous |
Right upper arm |
|
Vitamin- A |
Night Blindness |
At 9 months with measles |
1ml (1lakh IU) |
Oral |
Oral |
|
Varicella |
Chickenpox |
First Dose -15months Second Dose- 5years |
0.5ml |
Subcutaneous |
Right Upper arm |
|
Hepatitis- A |
Hepatitis A Virus (liver disease) |
First Dose -12 months Second dose -18 months |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Deltoid muscle of arm |
|
For Children |
|||||
|
DPT Booster and OPV Booster dose- 1 |
Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus and Poliomyelitis |
16-24 months |
0.5ml
2 drops |
Intramuscular and Oral |
Antero-side of mid thigh and Oral |
|
Vitamin A (2nd to 9th dose) |
Night Blindness |
One at 16-24 months with DPT/OPV Booster. Then Every 6 months up to 5 years |
2ml (2lakh IU) |
Oral |
Oral |
|
Typhoid |
Typhoid fever |
First Dose- 9months Second Dose-2 years |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Deltoid /Antero- lateral thigh |
|
DPT and OPV Booster dose -2 |
Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus |
5-6 years |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Right upper arm |
|
Tetanus Toxoid |
Tetanus |
10 years and 16 years |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Right upper arm |
|
HPV(Human Papilloma virus) |
Cancer of cervix |
10 years to 26 years at the interval of 0,2 and 6 months |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Deltoid |
|
For Pregnant Mothers |
|||||
|
Tetanus Toxoid -1 |
Tetanus (lockjaw) |
Early in pregnancy |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Upper arm |
|
Tetanus Toxoid -2 |
Tetanus |
4 weeks after TT-1 |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Upper arm |
Vaccines to be administered after consultation with Physician and Parents.
|
Japanese Encephalitis |
Japanese Encephalitis Virus |
16-24 months |
0.5ml |
Subcutaneous
|
Left upper arm |
|
Influenza Inactivated Vaccine (IIV) |
Flu illness |
6-7 months Every 1 year Booster
|
6-35 months - 0.25 ml repeat after 1month >3yrs- 0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Antero-lateral side of mid thigh |
|
Meningococcal Conjugate |
Meningitis |
At 11-12 year age Booster Dose at 16 years |
0.5ml |
Intramuscular |
Deltoid |
REFERENCES:
1. Park K. Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 21st edition. Jabalpur: Banarasidas Bhanot; 2009.
2. Gupta.M.C. Mahajan.B.K. Textbook of preventive and social medicine.3rd Edition. New Delhi. Jaypee Publications.2005
3. Indian Academy of Paediatrics committee on immunization (IAPCOI). Consensus recommendations on immunization and IAP immunization timetable 2012. Indian Pediatr.2012;49:549-64.
4. Vashishtha VM, Chudhury P, Bansal CP, Agarwal R editors. IAP guidebook on immunization 2013-2014. National Publication House, Indian Academy of Pediatrics, Gwalior 2014.
5. www.vaccineinformation.org
6. Sharma S. Nursing research and Statistics. 1st ed. New Delhi: Elsevier Publication; 2012
7. CR Kothari. Research methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2nd Ed. India: New Age Publications; 2009.
Received on 13.10.2016 Modified on 21.12.2016
Accepted on 15.01.2017 © A&V Publications all right reserved
Int. J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2017; 5(2): 136-139.
DOI: 10.5958/2454-2660.2017.00028.X